What is an Efficient Strategy?

The following is a question from a reader and Kathy Richardson answering their question about efficient strategies in the Counting Objects assessment in Assessing Math Concepts. If you would like to submit a question to Kathy please email info@mathperspectives.com.

 

Q: What are considered “efficient” strategies that lead to a correct solution as opposed to a strategy that leads to a correct solution? This is for kindergarten. For students solving an addition or subtraction problem. Thank you!

 

A: I think the term “efficient” is defined differently based on the situation. I think of efficient as the strategy with the fewest steps. So when adding and subtracting, the least efficient strategy would be counting all the objects. More efficient strategies would be those where the child is using what they know to figure out what they don’t know.

For example, a child might know he has 4 in a pile and be able to start counting with 4 without going back to counting from 1.

Another situation might be when a child sees a relationship. An example of this is a child who just solved 2 + 4 sees that 4 + 2 would result in the same answer. It is also efficient if a child just knows the answer without needing to figure it out. Many kindergarten children know 2 + 2 is 4 for example.

However, I do not consider strategies that lack meaning for the child to be “efficient.” That is why I think efficiency depends on the situation. What is efficient for one child is not efficient for another.

The most efficient way for most kindergarten children to arrive at an answer to an addition or subtraction problem is likely to be counting all. They can become more efficient as counting becomes easier for them so they don’t get mixed up when counting or need to recount to make sure they are right. Some kindergarten children will realize that they don’t have to count the 4 again when they already know they have 4; but other children will not really trust that they can get the right answer unless they start counting from 1.

I hope these thoughts are helpful to you. Let me know if you have any questions about my definition or if any additional questions come up. ~Kathy

Dead End Skills or Foundational Understandings?

Dead End Skills or Foundational Understandings?

by Kathy Richardson

Those of us working to improve the mathematics education of elementary students have seen many positive changes in the teaching and learning of mathematics. More and more teachers are excited about teaching mathematics and eager to give their student’s meaningful experiences. Teachers no longer view being  “good at math” as high scores on timed tests or accuracy when following procedures. Teachers recognize Keep reading →

More/Less Trains Question in Assessing Math Concepts

More/Less Trains Question in Assessing Math Concepts

Kathy Richardson is the author and developer of the Assessing Math Concepts (AMC) series of assessments, the Developing Number Concepts (DNC) series for Kindergarten through Second Grade Mathematics and Number Talks for the Pre-K and Primary Classroom. Kathy, Program Director for Math Perspectives, is one of the most respected early childhood mathematics educators.
Kathy answers questions from teachers across the country who are using AMC, DNC and Number Talks. If you have questions for Kathy, please send them to Math Perspectives at info@mathperspectives.com.

QUESTION
Hi Kathy! A few things have come up recently in analyzing assessments and I figured I would reach out and ask the expert herself! No rush on these; thank you in advance for your thoughts. Keep reading →

Teaching for Understanding

Teaching for Understanding

Thoughts from Kathy Richardson

There was a time when teachers were thought to be successful if they could get everyone in their class to do the same task correctly. The focus was on accomplishing the tasks rather than on developing an understanding of concepts. However, when we focus on teaching for understanding and try to find out what children really know and understand, we see that our children don’t all learn or understand the same things at the same time. The range of needs becomes clearer and clearer. Meeting this range of needs becomes one of our greatest challenges as it requires that we look closely at each of our children and provide the appropriate experiences for them. Keep reading →